Mar 3

Case Study: Valkyrie Eir Bands for Wrist and Thumb Activation in C4/5 SCI

Device: Valkyrie Eir Bands
Clinic: Hobbs Rehabilitation Intensive Neurotherapy Centre
Clinician: Kate Blythe, Senior Neurological Physiotherapist
Date: 05 September 2025
Patient Profile: 28-year-old woman with C4/5 spinal cord injury (SCI), ASIA C classification

1. Introduction & Context

Following sustaining a C4/C5 SCI injury, which has resulted in tetraplegia, the patient has limited hand function. She is able to utilise a tenodesis grip in her left hand; however, she has limited movement in her right wrist, fingers and thumb. The aim of using the Eir bands was to explore whether electrical stimulation would be clinically appropriate and whether a good movement pattern could be found for thumb flexion/extension and for wrist flexion and extension. The aim of using the device was to explore stimulation for the passive range of movement and the possibility of upper limb muscle activation recovery.

About The MiNT Academy:
The MiNT Academy supports innovators by trialling novel rehabilitation technologies. Valkyrie approached MiNT in late 2024 to act as early adopters, leveraging our clinical experience with innovative solutions. We received devices and training in exchange for providing clinician and patient feedback through this case study. 

About Valkyrie Industries:
Founded in 2017, Valkyrie Industries integrates extended reality (XR) with a patented NMES wearable. Their v-health platform combines immersive XR environments with wireless NMES to deliver interactive, gamified training experiences that strengthen muscles and retrain neuromuscular pathways. With a focus on haptics, XR, and rehabilitation, Valkyrie is dedicated to helping individuals regain mobility, independence, and quality of life.

2. Setup & Implementation

  • Setting: Outpatient clinic

  • Setup time: 5-10 minutes; however, this was also in part due to exploring electrode positioning

  • Training: As a clinician, I received a 2 hour training session.

  • App & device setup: We explored various different electrode positions, particularly for the thumb as the correct movement pattern for both flexion and extension was difficult to find. We were required to cut the electrodes to make them smaller for the hand to assist with this.

  • Duration: This was an exploratory session therefore, this device was only used once for the patient.

3. Ease of Use

Clinician Perspective:
The device is easy to set up however, you do need to remember to keep it charged up which is different to other FES devices which are generally battery operated therefore are ready to use.
During the session, the patient was able to control the stimulation via the phone which she was not able to do with other devices.


Patient Perspective:

"It did provide the movement we were looking for quite easily and concisely. I also think it was quite handy that you'd be able to use it via phone as these tend to be much more accessible than say something with buttons, for example."

4. Integration into Clinical Workflow

The Eir bands were used to explore electrical stimulation as a whole, therefore used as part of a dedicated electrical stimulation session. It was successful in finding passive wrist range of movement, therefore has the potential to replace the need for manual/passive stretching. This device can be used by 1 clinician; therefore no immediate impact on staffing. However, when only a few staff members are trained, this burdens the trained staff members with supporting the staff who remain untrained/unfamiliar with the device. As we are a tech centre, we are well versed in documenting our tech use; therefore, using the device did not add any further documentation burden. No challenges with scheduling, logistics, or maintenance were identified.

5. Observed Outcomes

Qualitative Results:
It was nice to see the patient engaging with the device, as generally this is difficult with limited hand function. 

6. Discussion & Lessons Learned

What Worked Well:
  • The patient being able to start and stop the stimulation independently
  • Easy setup, and I prefer the magnetic attachment over the standard wires
  • The electrodes were easy to cut to size

Challenges:

  • Needing to remember to charge the device/keep the device charged.
  • The device remains fairly passive within its current functionality in that, unless it is timed with an active task, there will likely be limited centrally driven change. However, this is generally a limitation for all FES devices unless EMG-triggered.


Resolution:

Getting the patient active within a task.


Comparison to Other NMES Systems:

I like the touch screen app as this does allow for more accessible use for patients with limited hand function.

7. Future Implementation & Recommendations

Suggested Improvements:
A wireless battery charger/stand so both phone and stimulators can remain charged.


Home Use Potential:

This would be easy for patients to use at home.


Training & Support:

The wider team have access to training.


Long-Term Integration at Hobbs Rehabilitation:

Although I like the functionality, in comparison to other devices, it does remain expensive. Other devices are used at tech that can be more cheaply purchased, and therefore, it may be difficult to justify the extra cost over other devices. i.e. Neurotrac ~£100

8. Conclusion

The Eir bands are easy to set up when you have a good understanding of electrical stimulation principles. They have been designed to be easier for a patient with reduced hand function to be able to set up independently which is great to see which in turn resulted in the patient being more engaged with the device.

— Kate Blythe, Specialist Neurological Physiotherapist, Hobbs Rehabilitation

Created with